Mobile News

. The article includes examples of a text message to Lollapalooza attendees offering them a chance to enter a guitar-playing contest that gave the winner a new guitar and a chance to play on stage with a band. Some musicians have competitions where they can win better seats via a text message. Prince asked fans leaving a concert to send a text message to his website, where the messages were displayed.

The article then goes on to talk about the marketing potential of all of this — where these musicians can supposedly now market to these fans, but that’s the wrong way to look at it. Fortunately, even those marketers quoted in the article admit that they need to tread carefully when it comes to marketing, admitting that the mobile phone is “sacred.” However, the temptation will probably be too strong for some to overcome — and that’s going to be risky. Those who are embracing text messaging with those attending concerts should recognize that text messaging is simply a completely new way to communicate and interact with fans — rather than just a one-way street to pitch them. The good news is that many of the experiments described recognize exactly that. However, the musicians should realize that this increased communication will pay benefits in a different way — making more loyal fans, more willing to go to more shows (and potentially even pay more for those shows). Greedily spamming someone’s phone with a pitch risks losing all of that benefit, for a very minor short-term return. Permalink…

The best news blog En RU CN countries

It’s easy to forget that just because a buyout has been announced, there’s no guarantee that it will actually go through. Pending private equity deals are particularly vulnerable at the moment, because they’re all debt financed. One good way to get a sense of whether the market is expecting a given to go through is to look at the current market price of a stock compared to the buyout price. The wider the gap, the less likely it’ll actually happen. These gaps are getting pretty wide on a number of deals, including a few discussed here. The purchase of Clear Channel was announced last November, but today the stock trades at 37% below the offering price. Alltel is in a similar boat, trading 22% below the buyout price, which was just announced in May. It’s still possible, of course, that both of these deals will get done. But if current conditions persist, we may see them hang around in their current form for a bit longer.

Suddenly, Mobile Phone Operators Are Big Supporters Of Smoking Bans…
If you suddenly start hearing stories about mobile phone operators being big supporters of bans on smoking, perhaps a new report is the reason why. Apparently, telcos in the UK are noticing a recent surge in text messaging, which they attribute to a new ban on smoking in confined spaces. The working theory is that smokers need something to do with their hands to keep them busy, and that texting is taking up that free time, now that they can’t smoke. It’s as good a theory as any, but it seems unlikely to have a very longterm impact.

The best news blog En RU CN countries

This has not been a good week for Qualcomm on the patent front. The company, which relies heavily on the patent system for its business model, is discovering that putting so much faith in patents can be a two-edged sword. It’s already been covered that the President Bush refused to intervene in the International Trade Commission’s decision to bar the import of next generation Qualcomm chips. However, as with many patent infringement fights, this battle is taking place on many fronts at once, with both sides suing each other over various patent infringement claims (the so-called nuclear war that is bound to break out when companies view patents as nuclear stockpiling). In one of the cases where Qualcomm charged Broadcom with infringement (rather than the other way around), a judge hasn’t just sided with Broadcom, but has stated that Qualcomm waived its right to enforce the patents in question by withholding info on the patents from a standards body. This type of behavior is becoming all too common when patents and standards bodies mix — and it’s causing all sorts of problems in delaying, fracturing and generally killing technology standards that would be helpful in driving the market forward. For its part, Qualcomm claims it played by the rules, though, that’s not saying it actually disclosed everything. Either way, it’s yet another reminder that patents are very much a two-edged sword, and those who bet entire business models on patents need to recognize how it can backfire.

Suddenly, Mobile Phone Operators Are Big Supporters Of Smoking Bans…
If you suddenly start hearing stories about mobile phone operators being big supporters of bans on smoking, perhaps a new report is the reason why. Apparently, telcos in the UK are noticing a recent surge in text messaging, which they attribute to a new ban on smoking in confined spaces. The working theory is that smokers need something to do with their hands to keep them busy, and that texting is taking up that free time, now that they can’t smoke. It’s as good a theory as any, but it seems unlikely to have a very longterm impact.

The best news blog En RU CN countries

to open up the “white space” spectrum — open airwaves in between those used by TV broadcasts — for use by electronic devices and broadband services. This has been talked about for quite some time, and represents one way to more efficiently use spectrum, which is a finite and very valuable resource. The group delivered a prototype to the FCC earlier this year, as a way to show that the technology to allow devices to automatically detect what spectrum’s in use and what’s available, and route communications accordingly, is viable. The FCC’s been testing it for several months, and it’s all good, except for one little problem: it doesn’t actually work. The Commission says the prototype couldn’t detect TV broadcasts, and it also sometimes interfered with them. While this current iteration of the technology sounds like a failure, the FCC is still open to the idea of allowing use of the white spaces; now Google, Microsoft and their friends just need to get the technology right before things can move forward.
Source: techdirt.com

Apple Sued For Patent Infringement On iPhone Keyboard
It’s almost surprising that it took this long, but someone has finally sued Apple for patent infringement related to the iPhone. Remember, back when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone he hyped up all the patents the company filed associated with the phone. It didn’t make sense to us, because many of the technologies in the iPhone weren’t new at all and had plenty of prior art. It was just the ability to put them all together in a compelling package that people would buy that was the key — and no one could simply mimic Apple’s ability to do that (though we can all watch others flounder around as they try). Still, with any new technologies these days, there’s bound to be a patent thicket, meaning that there would inevitably be patent disputes. We had discussed a potential patent suit over the touchscreen interface, but it’s not clear what became of that. In this latest case, the patent is for putting a keyboard on a touchscreen, which hardly seems like such a unique idea that it deserves a patent. Oddly, if you read the actual patent, it notes that “the input area… may not be minimized, maximized, or deleted.” Since the iPhone keyboard can be minimized, you would think this patent doesn’t apply. But, these days, why let little details prevent a patent lawsuit and potentially billions in payouts for doing nothing? Not surprisingly, the company is demanding a cut of every iPhone sold and wants an injunction against selling more iPhones with this technology included. Update: Turns out there’s even more to this story. The guy who holds the patent was recently sentenced to 51 months in prison for fraud.
Source: techdirt.com

Judge Tells Qualcomm It Waived Right To Enforce Patents
This has not been a good week for Qualcomm on the patent front. The company, which relies heavily on the patent system for its business model, is discovering that putting so much faith in patents can be a two-edged sword. It’s already been covered that the President Bush refused to intervene in the International Trade Commission’s decision to bar the import of next generation Qualcomm chips. However, as with many patent infringement fights, this battle is taking place on many fronts at once, with both sides suing each other over various patent infringement claims (the so-called nuclear war that is bound to break out when companies view patents as nuclear stockpiling). In one of the cases where Qualcomm charged Broadcom with infringement (rather than the other way around), a judge hasn’t just sided with Broadcom, but has stated that Qualcomm waived its right to enforce the patents in question by withholding info on the patents from a standards body. This type of behavior is becoming all too common when patents and standards bodies mix — and it’s causing all sorts of problems in delaying, fracturing and generally killing technology standards that would be helpful in driving the market forward. For its part, Qualcomm claims it played by the rules, though, that’s not saying it actually disclosed everything. Either way, it’s yet another reminder that patents are very much a two-edged sword, and those who bet entire business models on patents need to recognize how it can backfire.
Source: techdirt.com

President Bush Not Interested In Getting Involved In Qualcomm/Broadcom Patent Fight
Back in June, Broadcom used a bit of a loophole to get Qualcomm in trouble over patents. Rather than just going the traditional court route, Broadcom had the International Trade Commission simply decide that Qualcomm infringed on Broadcom patents, and bar the import of certain next generation Qualcomm chips. While Qualcomm will still appeal the decision in court, it also appealed directly to President Bush. It would appear the President has more important things to do with his time than get involved in a pointless patent battle, as he’s decided to allow the ban to stand. Once again, expect many more companies to start going to the International Trade Commission as a way of getting around court rulings that have been a lot less kind to bogus patents lately. In the meantime, Qualcomm claims it has a workaround to avoid infringing on the patent, but somehow we expect Broadcom won’t be satisfied.
Source: techdirt.com

Not Only Is Ricochet Still Around, But It’s Been Sold, Yet Again
When Ricochet was launched in the late ’90s, its cellular modem service for laptops was pretty unique. However, services from major mobile operators quickly passed it in terms of data speeds, coverage and price, and Metricom, the company behind Ricochet, eventually went bankrupt in 2001. Since then, it’s traded hands several times, but its owners have never had much success with it — which is hardly surprising, again, given the way it’s been surpassed in nearly every aspect by other mobile broadband services, as well as the proliferation of WiFi hotspots. The surprising part is that Ricochet still exists at all, but it does, and — brace yourself — it’s been sold again. It looks like the company only offers low-speed mobile service in the Denver area at this point, but it appears to be trying to expand into the WiFi market as well. We would say that it’s probably not long for this world since it still doesn’t offer much (if any) benefit over other services, but with the way it’s managed to bounce around and stay afloat, perhaps we shouldn’t.
Source: techdirt.com

Suddenly, Mobile Phone Operators Are Big Supporters Of Smoking Bans…
If you suddenly start hearing stories about mobile phone operators being big supporters of bans on smoking, perhaps a new report is the reason why. Apparently, telcos in the UK are noticing a recent surge in text messaging, which they attribute to a new ban on smoking in confined spaces. The working theory is that smokers need something to do with their hands to keep them busy, and that texting is taking up that free time, now that they can’t smoke. It’s as good a theory as any, but it seems unlikely to have a very longterm impact.
Source: techdirt.com

Broadband Speeds Averaging About 1/3 Of The Speed On The Box
By this point, everyone should know that broadband providers always provide “up to” speeds with the connections they sell. By “up to” they usually mean under perfect conditions that you will never, ever see. But just what kinds of speeds should you actually expect? A new study in the UK found that broadband speeds tend to be about a third of the “up to” speed. The worst speeds were about one-eighth of the promoted speed. As the article linked here notes, is it really any surprise that only 30% of people claim they’re satisfied with their broadband? While it still seems like this should be false advertising, so far various regulatory bodies have said that the “up to” language is perfectly legal, no matter how misleading it may be. How hard would it be for an ISP to advertise expected speeds? I would imagine it would have happier, more loyal customers who know that the ISP is actually being honest, rather than hyping up speeds that will never be delivered.
Source: techdirt.com

The best news blog En RU CN countries

to open up the “white space” spectrum — open airwaves in between those used by TV broadcasts — for use by electronic devices and broadband services. This has been talked about for quite some time, and represents one way to more efficiently use spectrum, which is a finite and very valuable resource. The group delivered a prototype to the FCC earlier this year, as a way to show that the technology to allow devices to automatically detect what spectrum’s in use and what’s available, and route communications accordingly, is viable. The FCC’s been testing it for several months, and it’s all good, except for one little problem: it doesn’t actually work. The Commission says the prototype couldn’t detect TV broadcasts, and it also sometimes interfered with them. While this current iteration of the technology sounds like a failure, the FCC is still open to the idea of allowing use of the white spaces; now Google, Microsoft and their friends just need to get the technology right before things can move forward. Permalink…

Efforts by incumbent telcos to stifle municipalities’ attempts to roll out municipal broadband projects may not get the press they did a few years back, but the carriers are still at it, trying to get state legislatures to pass laws banning or hamstringing muni broadband. This week, though, a bill was introduced in the house that would prevent states from passing such laws. It follows similar legislation that was introduced in the Senate, and appears to already have a broad base of support — but given the power of the telco lobby in Washington, we won’t count the eggs before they’ve hatched. Permalink…

This has not been a good week for Qualcomm on the patent front. The company, which relies heavily on the patent system for its business model, is discovering that putting so much faith in patents can be a two-edged sword. It’s already been covered that the President Bush refused to intervene in the International Trade Commission’s decision to bar the import of next generation Qualcomm chips. However, as with many patent infringement fights, this battle is taking place on many fronts at once, with both sides suing each other over various patent infringement claims (the so-called nuclear war that is bound to break out when companies view patents as nuclear stockpiling). In one of the cases where Qualcomm charged Broadcom with infringement (rather than the other way around), a judge hasn’t just sided with Broadcom, but has stated that Qualcomm waived its right to enforce the patents in question by withholding info on the patents from a standards body. This type of behavior is becoming all too common when patents and standards bodies mix — and it’s causing all sorts of problems in delaying, fracturing and generally killing technology standards that would be helpful in driving the market forward. For its part, Qualcomm claims it played by the rules, though, that’s not saying it actually disclosed everything. Either way, it’s yet another reminder that patents are very much a two-edged sword, and those who bet entire business models on patents need to recognize how it can backfire. Permalink…

By this point, everyone should know that broadband providers always provide “up to” speeds with the connections they sell. By “up to” they usually mean under perfect conditions that you will never, ever see. But just what kinds of speeds should you actually expect? A new study in the UK found that broadband speeds tend to be about a third of the “up to” speed. The worst speeds were about one-eighth of the promoted speed. As the article linked here notes, is it really any surprise that only 30% of people claim they’re satisfied with their broadband? While it still seems like this should be false advertising, so far various regulatory bodies have said that the “up to” language is perfectly legal, no matter how misleading it may be. How hard would it be for an ISP to advertise expected speeds? I would imagine it would have happier, more loyal customers who know that the ISP is actually being honest, rather than hyping up speeds that will never be delivered. Permalink…

The best news blog En RU CN countries

, but the carriers are still at it, trying to get state legislatures to pass laws banning or hamstringing muni broadband. This week, though, a bill was introduced in the house that would prevent states from passing such laws. It follows similar legislation that was introduced in the Senate, and appears to already have a broad base of support — but given the power of the telco lobby in Washington, we won’t count the eggs before they’ve hatched.
Source: techdirt.com

Latest Shot At The Personal Mobile Hub Looks A Lot More Open
If you’ve been in the mobile space for a long time, you may recall the buzz from nearly a decade ago about the concept of the “personal mobile hub.” The idea was that computers don’t need to be big (even laptop big) general machines, but rather you could break out the components and make for interesting combinations. That is, you could have a small core unit that was basically just a CPU with some wireless connectivity, and then add in additional components as necessary (or simply let other things connect to the hub). So, your mobile phone could connect to the hub to get better wireless capabilities. You could also have a separate storage module for extra storage. Then, perhaps you could have different screen technology depending on what you needed. Or different inputs. The whole idea was to make computing a lot more modular. Unfortunately, pretty much every attempt at doing so failed (often miserably). For years, the concept was championed by a company called IXI, who got a lot of hype but produced little in the way of a product for quite some time. In 2004, it finally came up with a product called the ogo, which was a messaging device sold by AT&T Wireless. However, the other components (the whole point of such a system) never appeared and the device mostly died off (though, it’s been revived at times elsewhere).

There’s some buzz going around about a new startup called Bug Labs that is in some ways bringing back this very concept with more of an open source/DIY/hacker ethos. Right now, exactly what Bug Labs is doing isn’t entirely clear, but it sounds like they’re producing something quite similar to the general idea of the personal mobile hub — but making it very open and encouraging everyone else to develop apps and systems for it. In fact, it sounds like the company doesn’t plan on being in the hardware business at all. This is definitely a step forward from the IXI way of doing things, but it still remains to be seen whether or not the market really buys into the idea of modular computing in this manner. The good news for Bug Labs, however, is that if such a concept is going to succeed, it’s probably going to take an approach similar to what Bug is doing.
Source: techdirt.com

Ad Sales On Muni Wireless Networks Yet Another Example Of Unrealistic Expectations
Many of the hype-fuelled municipal WiFi plans made by various cities across the country involved free services supported by advertising. The party line was that businesses would love the chance to advertise to users in their immediate vicinity, while users would eat up the free services. Unsurprisingly, like muni WiFi in general, the actual deployments attempts at generating ad revenues have failed to live up to the inflated expectations. One of the biggest problems was that advertisers would have to do deals with individual networks, making it much more difficult to get make a wide ad buy than with other media like traditional web ads. That’s starting to change, as a handful of companies are sprouting up to set up nationwide ad networks, allowing marketers to make purchases across multiple muni WiFi networks. That’s a good step, but it’s not a complete solution. Many networks have had teething problems that that have generated bad press and hardly encouraged usage, while the idea that businesses will pay a premium to advertise to local users may be oft-repeated, but remains unproven. One area where WiFi networks are seeing strong ad sales? Airports and hotels, where the attraction for marketers is a high number of business travelers. The different demographics of free municipal networks may not dictate the same level of demand.
Source: techdirt.com

FCC Pays Open Access Wireless Networks Some Lip Service
The FCC yesterday approved the rules for the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum license auction, scheduled for early next year. This is an important auction because of the quantity and quality of spectrum it covers, making it particularly suitable for wireless broadband networks. A coalition headed by Google has been pushing the FCC to adopt four “open access” principles for the spectrum, which would require license winners to open their networks to any compatible device, allow users to access any service they wish, and to sell wholesale access to their network to third parties. Google even said it would bid at least $4.6 billion in the auction if the FCC adopted the four principles. Unsurprisingly, the FCC didn’t, instead going with rules that were largely along the lines of what Chairman Kevin Martin had earlier proposed: licenses for 22 of the 60 MHz on offer will require winners to allow any compatible device on their network and not block access to any services, but will not have the wholesale requirement that Google and its partners were looking for.

Without question, there’s some gamesmanship going on here. If Google really wants to own spectrum licenses and have a network that follows its open access principles, there’s nothing preventing it from bidding in the auction, winning licenses, and either running its network that way, or leasing the licenses to somebody who will. What’s more likely, though, is that Google simply wants the ability to buy wholesale network access, rather than own licenses or build its own network. Again, there’s nothing preventing it from entering into such a deal with any license holder, but requiring all the license holders to wholesale access would create a more competitive market and drive down prices. But perhaps the bigger game here is the political one by the FCC. These open access rules, really, are pretty toothless, and perhaps that’s best illustrated by the fact that both AT&T and Verizon support them. The device requirement could easily be rendered meaningless by the winning bidder’s choice of technology for their network. Using a proprietary or unpopular technology would likely mean that the only outlet to purchase compatible devices would be from the network provider. The open access to services requirement is one the operators would likely follow anyway, since blocking access to certain sites and services wouldn’t make their wireless broadband services too popular with consumers.

While perhaps these rules represent a small first step for the FCC towards fostering a more competitive broadband, they seem much more like a missed opportunity to affect some real change. It seems like more than anything, this is a bit of smoke and mirrors that makes it look, to the casual observer, like the FCC’s done something significant, when it’s actually done very little — and that would fit with the persistent whispering about Martin’s political ambitions.
Source: techdirt.com

Two Airlines Move Ahead With In-Flight Internet Plans
One of the many modern tech myths seems to be the idea that in-flight internet access is guaranteed to be a success, even though this has proven not to be the case. The supposed demand for the service among travelers hasn’t been enough to overcome the cost of the service, both for airlines and end users, and technical barriers, as highlighted by the failure of Boeing’s much-hyped Connexion service. Now, however, one of the airlines that offered Connexion, Lufthansa, says it’s working with T-Mobile to bring back in-flight internet access, while American has signed a deal with AirCell to offer its service to travelers on some planes. Lufthansa wants a system that supports WiFi, but also SMS and cellular data, though it won’t allow cellular voice calls; American plans to test WiFi access on some transcontinental domestic flights before deciding whether to proceed. The American system will differ from Connexion in that it won’t use satellites, but an air-to-ground radio system, explaining why it will only be available domestically. Hopefully this will translate into lower costs for consumers than the $30 per flight Connexion charged, otherwise the service will suffer the same fate. Lufthansa is reportedly looking at a satellite-based system for its long-haul flights, and unless it’s figured out some way to slash the costs of such a system and pass the savings on to consumers, it’s hard to see things working out any better this time around.
Source: techdirt.com

The best news blog En RU CN countries

, but the carriers are still at it, trying to get state legislatures to pass laws banning or hamstringing muni broadband. This week, though, a bill was introduced in the house that would prevent states from passing such laws. It follows similar legislation that was introduced in the Senate, and appears to already have a broad base of support — but given the power of the telco lobby in Washington, we won’t count the eggs before they’ve hatched. Permalink…

The FCC yesterday approved the rules for the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum license auction, scheduled for early next year. This is an important auction because of the quantity and quality of spectrum it covers, making it particularly suitable for wireless broadband networks. A coalition headed by Google has been pushing the FCC to adopt four “open access” principles for the spectrum, which would require license winners to open their networks to any compatible device, allow users to access any service they wish, and to sell wholesale access to their network to third parties. Google even said it would bid at least $4.6 billion in the auction if the FCC adopted the four principles. Unsurprisingly, the FCC didn’t, instead going with rules that were largely along the lines of what Chairman Kevin Martin had earlier proposed: licenses for 22 of the 60 MHz on offer will require winners to allow any compatible device on their network and not block access to any services, but will not have the wholesale requirement that Google and its partners were looking for.

Without question, there’s some gamesmanship going on here. If Google really wants to own spectrum licenses and have a network that follows its open access principles, there’s nothing preventing it from bidding in the auction, winning licenses, and either running its network that way, or leasing the licenses to somebody who will. What’s more likely, though, is that Google simply wants the ability to buy wholesale network access, rather than own licenses or build its own network. Again, there’s nothing preventing it from entering into such a deal with any license holder, but requiring all the license holders to wholesale access would create a more competitive market and drive down prices. But perhaps the bigger game here is the political one by the FCC. These open access rules, really, are pretty toothless, and perhaps that’s best illustrated by the fact that both AT&T and Verizon support them. The device requirement could easily be rendered meaningless by the winning bidder’s choice of technology for their network. Using a proprietary or unpopular technology would likely mean that the only outlet to purchase compatible devices would be from the network provider. The open access to services requirement is one the operators would likely follow anyway, since blocking access to certain sites and services wouldn’t make their wireless broadband services too popular with consumers.

While perhaps these rules represent a small first step for the FCC towards fostering a more competitive broadband, they seem much more like a missed opportunity to affect some real change. It seems like more than anything, this is a bit of smoke and mirrors that makes it look, to the casual observer, like the FCC’s done something significant, when it’s actually done very little — and that would fit with the persistent whispering about Martin’s political ambitions. Permalink…

Many of the hype-fuelled municipal WiFi plans made by various cities across the country involved free services supported by advertising. The party line was that businesses would love the chance to advertise to users in their immediate vicinity, while users would eat up the free services. Unsurprisingly, like muni WiFi in general, the actual deployments attempts at generating ad revenues have failed to live up to the inflated expectations. One of the biggest problems was that advertisers would have to do deals with individual networks, making it much more difficult to get make a wide ad buy than with other media like traditional web ads. That’s starting to change, as a handful of companies are sprouting up to set up nationwide ad networks, allowing marketers to make purchases across multiple muni WiFi networks. That’s a good step, but it’s not a complete solution. Many networks have had teething problems that that have generated bad press and hardly encouraged usage, while the idea that businesses will pay a premium to advertise to local users may be oft-repeated, but remains unproven. One area where WiFi networks are seeing strong ad sales? Airports and hotels, where the attraction for marketers is a high number of business travelers. The different demographics of free municipal networks may not dictate the same level of demand. Permalink…

If you’ve been in the mobile space for a long time, you may recall the buzz from nearly a decade ago about the concept of the “personal mobile hub.” The idea was that computers don’t need to be big (even laptop big) general machines, but rather you could break out the components and make for interesting combinations. That is, you could have a small core unit that was basically just a CPU with some wireless connectivity, and then add in additional components as necessary (or simply let other things connect to the hub). So, your mobile phone could connect to the hub to get better wireless capabilities. You could also have a separate storage module for extra storage. Then, perhaps you could have different screen technology depending on what you needed. Or different inputs. The whole idea was to make computing a lot more modular. Unfortunately, pretty much every attempt at doing so failed (often miserably). For years, the concept was championed by a company called IXI, who got a lot of hype but produced little in the way of a product for quite some time. In 2004, it finally came up with a product called the ogo, which was a messaging device sold by AT&T Wireless. However, the other components (the whole point of such a system) never appeared and the device mostly died off (though, it’s been revived at times elsewhere).

There’s some buzz going around about a new startup called Bug Labs that is in some ways bringing back this very concept with more of an open source/DIY/hacker ethos. Right now, exactly what Bug Labs is doing isn’t entirely clear, but it sounds like they’re producing something quite similar to the general idea of the personal mobile hub — but making it very open and encouraging everyone else to develop apps and systems for it. In fact, it sounds like the company doesn’t plan on being in the hardware business at all. This is definitely a step forward from the IXI way of doing things, but it still remains to be seen whether or not the market really buys into the idea of modular computing in this manner. The good news for Bug Labs, however, is that if such a concept is going to succeed, it’s probably going to take an approach similar to what Bug is doing. Permalink…

One of the many modern tech myths seems to be the idea that in-flight internet access is guaranteed to be a success, even though this has proven not to be the case. The supposed demand for the service among travelers hasn’t been enough to overcome the cost of the service, both for airlines and end users, and technical barriers, as highlighted by the failure of Boeing’s much-hyped Connexion service. Now, however, one of the airlines that offered Connexion, Lufthansa, says it’s working with T-Mobile to bring back in-flight internet access, while American has signed a deal with AirCell to offer its service to travelers on some planes. Lufthansa wants a system that supports WiFi, but also SMS and cellular data, though it won’t allow cellular voice calls; American plans to test WiFi access on some transcontinental domestic flights before deciding whether to proceed. The American system will differ from Connexion in that it won’t use satellites, but an air-to-ground radio system, explaining why it will only be available domestically. Hopefully this will translate into lower costs for consumers than the $30 per flight Connexion charged, otherwise the service will suffer the same fate. Lufthansa is reportedly looking at a satellite-based system for its long-haul flights, and unless it’s figured out some way to slash the costs of such a system and pass the savings on to consumers, it’s hard to see things working out any better this time around. Permalink…

The best news blog En RU CN countries

The FCC yesterday approved the rules for the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum license auction, scheduled for early next year. This is an important auction because of the quantity and quality of spectrum it covers, making it particularly suitable for wireless broadband networks. A coalition headed by Google has been pushing the FCC to adopt four “open access” principles for the spectrum, which would require license winners to open their networks to any compatible device, allow users to access any service they wish, and to sell wholesale access to their network to third parties. Google even said it would bid at least $4.6 billion in the auction if the FCC adopted the four principles. Unsurprisingly, the FCC didn’t, instead going with rules that were largely along the lines of what Chairman Kevin Martin had earlier proposed: licenses for 22 of the 60 MHz on offer will require winners to allow any compatible device on their network and not block access to any services, but will not have the wholesale requirement that Google and its partners were looking for.

Without question, there’s some gamesmanship going on here. If Google really wants to own spectrum licenses and have a network that follows its open access principles, there’s nothing preventing it from bidding in the auction, winning licenses, and either running its network that way, or leasing the licenses to somebody who will. What’s more likely, though, is that Google simply wants the ability to buy wholesale network access, rather than own licenses or build its own network. Again, there’s nothing preventing it from entering into such a deal with any license holder, but requiring all the license holders to wholesale access would create a more competitive market and drive down prices. But perhaps the bigger game here is the political one by the FCC. These open access rules, really, are pretty toothless, and perhaps that’s best illustrated by the fact that both AT&T and Verizon support them. The device requirement could easily be rendered meaningless by the winning bidder’s choice of technology for their network. Using a proprietary or unpopular technology would likely mean that the only outlet to purchase compatible devices would be from the network provider. The open access to services requirement is one the operators would likely follow anyway, since blocking access to certain sites and services wouldn’t make their wireless broadband services too popular with consumers.

While perhaps these rules represent a small first step for the FCC towards fostering a more competitive broadband, they seem much more like a missed opportunity to affect some real change. It seems like more than anything, this is a bit of smoke and mirrors that makes it look, to the casual observer, like the FCC’s done something significant, when it’s actually done very little — and that would fit with the persistent whispering about Martin’s political ambitions.

The best news blog En RU CN countries

made by various cities across the country involved free services supported by advertising. The party line was that businesses would love the chance to advertise to users in their immediate vicinity, while users would eat up the free services. Unsurprisingly, like muni WiFi in general, the actual deployments attempts at generating ad revenues have failed to live up to the inflated expectations. One of the biggest problems was that advertisers would have to do deals with individual networks, making it much more difficult to get make a wide ad buy than with other media like traditional web ads. That’s starting to change, as a handful of companies are sprouting up to set up nationwide ad networks, allowing marketers to make purchases across multiple muni WiFi networks. That’s a good step, but it’s not a complete solution. Many networks have had teething problems that that have generated bad press and hardly encouraged usage, while the idea that businesses will pay a premium to advertise to local users may be oft-repeated, but remains unproven. One area where WiFi networks are seeing strong ad sales? Airports and hotels, where the attraction for marketers is a high number of business travelers. The different demographics of free municipal networks may not dictate the same level of demand. Permalink…

The FCC yesterday approved the rules for the upcoming 700 MHz spectrum license auction, scheduled for early next year. This is an important auction because of the quantity and quality of spectrum it covers, making it particularly suitable for wireless broadband networks. A coalition headed by Google has been pushing the FCC to adopt four “open access” principles for the spectrum, which would require license winners to open their networks to any compatible device, allow users to access any service they wish, and to sell wholesale access to their network to third parties. Google even said it would bid at least $4.6 billion in the auction if the FCC adopted the four principles. Unsurprisingly, the FCC didn’t, instead going with rules that were largely along the lines of what Chairman Kevin Martin had earlier proposed: licenses for 22 of the 60 MHz on offer will require winners to allow any compatible device on their network and not block access to any services, but will not have the wholesale requirement that Google and its partners were looking for.

Without question, there’s some gamesmanship going on here. If Google really wants to own spectrum licenses and have a network that follows its open access principles, there’s nothing preventing it from bidding in the auction, winning licenses, and either running its network that way, or leasing the licenses to somebody who will. What’s more likely, though, is that Google simply wants the ability to buy wholesale network access, rather than own licenses or build its own network. Again, there’s nothing preventing it from entering into such a deal with any license holder, but requiring all the license holders to wholesale access would create a more competitive market and drive down prices. But perhaps the bigger game here is the political one by the FCC. These open access rules, really, are pretty toothless, and perhaps that’s best illustrated by the fact that both AT&T and Verizon support them. The device requirement could easily be rendered meaningless by the winning bidder’s choice of technology for their network. Using a proprietary or unpopular technology would likely mean that the only outlet to purchase compatible devices would be from the network provider. The open access to services requirement is one the operators would likely follow anyway, since blocking access to certain sites and services wouldn’t make their wireless broadband services too popular with consumers.

While perhaps these rules represent a small first step for the FCC towards fostering a more competitive broadband, they seem much more like a missed opportunity to affect some real change. It seems like more than anything, this is a bit of smoke and mirrors that makes it look, to the casual observer, like the FCC’s done something significant, when it’s actually done very little — and that would fit with the persistent whispering about Martin’s political ambitions. Permalink…

The best news blog En RU CN countries

Just last month, we noted how FCC Chairman Kevin Martin sounds like a broken record when it comes to telecom policy, always covering the same ground with his same old ideas of what constitutes a competitive market. Maybe the summer heat has gotten to him, but he’s now gone and changed all that, as he’s getting ready to propose dramatic new rules for the upcoming 700 MHz wireless spectrum license auction, mandating that winners of licenses for a third of the spectrum build open-access networks — networks that allow any compatible device to connect and for any service to be run across them. The 700 MHz spectrum is pretty prime real estate, as these things go: there’s a lot of spectrum that will be available, and the low frequency gives it excellent propagation and building-penetration characteristics. There’s been a lot of talk from tech companies and other groups about handling these licenses differently than previous ones, in order to encourage the development of broadband wireless networks that offer real competition to fixed-line networks. Typically, this entails mandating that license winners build wholesale networks which sell access to any service provider that wants to then sell the service on to consumers. While Martin’s draft of rules doesn’t go that far, it does offer a significant change to how wireless spectrum licenses have typically been sold and regulated. Unsurprisingly, the trade group of cellular operators isn’t happy, and says that there’s no need to regulate what it sees as a perfectly competitive marketplace. Whether or not the cell phone service market is competitive is an argument for another day, but it’s pretty clear that as things stand now, it doesn’t have much of a competitive impact on the broadband market, which is still largely a duopoly of cable and telephone companies. The operators hope to use their deep pockets to buy up as much spectrum as possible — not just to use it themselves, but to keep it out of the hands of any potential new entrants that could come into the market and actually compel them to compete.

Tec-Sem
Tec-Sem, founded in 1981, is one of the pioneers in cleanroom automation. The company was strongly involved during the conversion from 6in to 8in wafer processing in 1986 and also in the introduction of 300mm automation equipment in 1996. In 1994, Tec-Sem introduced the first bare reticle storage systems to the market which today are industry standard. Tec-Sem offers a wide range of automation systems for cleanroom applications such as single wafer management systems, fab automation and logistic systems as well as wafer loading systems for batch process equipment. Thanks to the more than 20 years’ experience in developing wafer handling systems, Tec-Sem is a well-trusted partner in the semiconductor industry. SINGLE WAFER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Today, wafers in the fabs are still stored in wafer containers as batches on shelves or in cassette stockers. Specifically for small production or test lots, the management of these wafers in cassette batches is far from optimal. Very long wafer access times, huge floor-space consumption and too much wafer and cassette traffic are the problems created by this batch handling. These problems can be eliminated by the full integration of bare wafer storage with single wafer sorting into one single tool (single wafer management system). The graph on the right-hand side illustrates the differences. The performance difference between today’s batch-based logistics and Tec-Sem’s single wafer management systems can be easily proven when looking at a realistic example of a lot split from 12 wafers out of a mother FOUP into six child FOUPS (one cassette transfer is assumed as 5mins). Tec-Sem decided to offer completely new products to the market which integrate the sorter functionality with bare wafer storage capability on minimum floor space. The first so-called single wafer management system for 300mm wafers was installed already in 2001 and today different fabs are using this technology with great success. Interest in this new technology is rapidly picking up speed. The latest product of the single wafer managers is the new Pr@ctor sorter / stocker. IMPROVED WAFER STORAGE QUALITY AND N2 PURGING Another important aspect for future fabs will be the improvement in cleanliness in wafer handling and storage. The new, patent-pending bare wafer storage technology of Tec-Sem allows the creation of so-called Micro Cleanrooms inside the stocker area. This again allows storage of the wafer under extremely clean and controlled conditions (ISO1) as well as separation of different wafer categories which should not be mixed. Also, the possibility of purging all or part of the wafers in the stocker is increasingly important. WAFER TRACKING AND HOST INTEGRATION Lastly, the full integration into the existing factory control systems (MES) is crucial to guarantee data integrity and history tracking in the fab. Individual or multiple single wafer management systems can be linked either directly to the fab MES or through a separate, single wafer capable middle-ware software (WSM). CUSTOMER VALUE AND PAYBACK Every investment must be justifiable by a quick return on investment. The Tec-Sem single wafer management systems are already proven in different leading 300mm fabs and offer clear savings potentials in the following areas: Reduced investments in equipment, floor-space and cassettes Avoidance of unnecessary traffic reduces load on MES and AMHS systems Much faster wafer access time reduces waiting times Highly improved wafer storage quality with Micro Cleanroom technology and N2 purging Different systems for 200mm and 300mm wafers with different capacity up to 2,700 wafers Seamless integration into fab control systems and 100% single wafer history tracking

The best news blog En RU CN countries